A1: 0.50. (0.8 + 0.4 + 0.6 + 0.2) /
4. This unit is at the exact baseline of survival.
A2: 0.54. [0.4(0.9) + 0.6(0.3)] =
0.36 + 0.18. Despite high physical wealth, their true α1 stability is critically
low.
A3: 50%. 60 minutes / 120 minutes.
Half of the family's α2 process time is consumed by the 3Ds.
A4: 10.7%. 112 total - 20 chores - 80
Action A = 12 hours for Action Y. 12 / 112 = 10.7%. A severe A-Y Defect.
A5: 0.40. 0.8 times 0.5 = 0.40 (or
40% chance).
A6: 26 defects prevented. Without
framework: 200 times 0.15 = 30. With framework: 200 times 0.02 = 4. 30 - 4 =
26.
A7: Net Score: +1. (5 times 1) + (2
times -2) = 5 - 4 = 1. The system is optimizing, but barely. Defect elimination is
required.
A8: Policy Y. The Dwivedi-Nash
Equilibrium mandates Delta sum N* > 0 AND min(N*{post}) >= min(N*{pre}). Policy X
raises the total but lowers Employee A from 0.4 to 0.3, violating the mandate.
Policy Y raises the total to 1.8 without lowering any individual's baseline.
A9: 80 interventions. Process
Excellence mandates striking the root cause, not the symptom. 80% of the root causes
are in α2, therefore 80% of the CAPA resources should go there.
A10: +0.04. 0.15 - 0.08 - 0.03 =
+0.04. The deliberate optimization (F) outpaced the systemic friction and random
shocks.